Elf Child
by David M. Pierce
Southern Tier Editions, Harrington Park Press, 2003
ISBN 1-56023-428-8
“There was a boy, a very strange enchanted boy...”
Besides being drop-dead gorgeous and having a name to conjure with,
Russell Hezekiah Lincoln has a secret: he is an elf child. A
spontaneous genetic mutation in one of his ancestors means that he is
immortal, barring accidents. He will never age and he has the ability
to alter his appearance at will. He is also gay.
Most of us would kill to be in this position. Imagine looking not only
stunningly handsome but also eternally young without ending up with
surgically induced wind tunnel face syndrome. He is a modern Dorian
Gray without the vice. Unfortunately, this situation has its drawbacks.
Russ is 48 but looks 23. He can never have a long-term relationship
with anyone because they will age as he stays young. He has to change
his appearance for short periods from time to time otherwise it will
alter spontaneously. His own mother’s tragic history, which forms one
of the sub-plots, has impressed upon him the need for secrecy. The
result is a profound loneliness which he tries to relieve with a
never-ending series of one night stands. Then, one morning at the
beach, he meets Eric Taylor, a young man in his early twenties. They
fall in love. He cannot believe his luck. Despite the warnings of his
mother, another elf child, they set up house together.
One day, by accident, Eric discovers another of Russ’s attributes. He
can charm plants. Eric sees Russ communing with a Swedish ivy which
turns its leaves towards him and reaches out its tendril to comfort
him. Bewildered by what he has seen and already puzzled by some of
Russ’s seemingly eccentric habits, he begins to question his situation
and realises how little he knows about Russ. He goes rummaging among
Russ’s effects in the loft and discovers that he is much older than he
assumed (Russ has never lied to him, simply been economical with the
actualité). Russ, who is psychically sensitive to mood, realises
something is up and returns home to find Eric packing to leave.
Desperate to keep Eric, he confesses all and gives him a demonstration
of his shape-shifting abilities. Although at first repelled and
appalled, Eric is won over and decides to stay.
However, the story doesn’t end here. Complications inevitably ensue.
Their widowed mothers in their various ways become involved. Eric is
subjected to a vicious bout of gay-bashing that almost kills him. Russ,
Eric’s best friend Kevin and both mothers are instrumental in saving
him and Russ wreaks vengeance/justice.
Mr. Pierce’s story is extremely well-written. His story more than
adequately meets the criteria, set out by Wilkie Collins’s, of the good
novel – “make ‘em laugh, make ‘em cry and make ‘em wait”. I read the
book in a day because I was desperate to know what happened next. Both
the main characters are ingratiating and have the reader rooting for
them. Neither is perfect and each grapples with a reality that has been
thrust upon him to salvage his relationship with the other.
This is not all. Elf Child is an allegory or a parable. It points up
how so-called Western liberal democracies pay lip service to individual
freedom and liberty but come down like a ton of bricks on anyone who
wishes to exercise that freedom. Those in power can never resist
telling the rest of us how to live. One is reminded of John Wyndham’s
The Chrysalids in which every home has a text on the wall that says
“Beware the Mutant”. We are all of us mutants, deviants from the norm
in one way or another. It ill behoves the rest of humanity to hold us
to account because of it, blaming us (in the words of the song) for
being what we are. Mr. Pierce’s story functions on several levels -
parable, allegory, fantasy, love story and rattling good yarn. Anyone
willing to suspend disbelief and settle down for a good read will not
be disappointed by it.
|
Le
Fate Ignoranti (2001)
DVD
(The Ignorant Fairies)
Dir: Ferzan Özpetek
Known in America as His Secret
Life, Le Fate Ignoranti has received a lot of ignorant criticism
in the press, chiefly on account of what it isn’t. One wouldn’t
criticise Pride and Prejudice for not being Anna Karenina and it seems
perverse to accuse a tragicomedy of not being a tragedy. This is
a thoroughly enjoyable film in its own terms and should be approached
as such.
The story is as follows: Massimo is married to Antonia. They live in a
splendid bourgeois house outside Rome. One day Massimo is killed in a
car accident. Antonia is devastated. Massimo’s personal effects are
sent home from his office and among them is a print of a painting with
an inscription on the back which refers to the seven years the writer
and Massimo have loved each other. Antonia is devastated, never having
for a moment suspected that he had been unfaithful. She determines to
track this mistress down. She traces the painting to an address down by
the gasworks on the banks of the Tiber. (Having recently watched a
re-run of a Perry Mason film set in Paris which had the actors
apparently rounding a corner on the Rue de Rivoli to encounter the
Eiffel Tower, which is at the other side of the city, I was relieved to
see that the director resisted the temptation to use the monuments of
Rome as a distracting backdrop. The story is the subject, not the
scenery.)
After trying to keep the truth from her, the young man whose flat she
has visited admits that he sent the picture to Massimo. He was the
lover, not some mysterious woman. This, to Antonia’s mind, is adding
insult to injury. However, she can’t keep away. She wants to know more
of what went on in order to understand the husband whom she now feels
she never knew. She realises that the moments he snatched with Michele
were in many ways far richer than the life they had together. Slowly
she is drawn into Michele’s circle of outcasts, just as Massimo was,
and acquires a surrogate family. Michele’s is the shoulder on which a
wide circle of friends lean. She is attracted by his kindness as
Massimo must have been, albeit in a different way. She, in her turn,
proves her value to Michele, saving the life of Ernesto who has AIDS
and whom Michele has been nursing.
The end of the story comes as a surprise and is left open-ended.
Nothing is resolved but we feel optimistic. There are several reasons
for watching this film other than wishing to know how the plot unfolds.
The camera work is beautiful, as one would expect from an Italian film;
the incidental music is movingly atmospheric; the dialogue is delivered
passionately and eloquently; the acting is superb and all of the actors
are attractive in one way or another. Margherita Buy (Antonia) and
Stefano Accorsi (Michele) turn in excellent performances as Massimo’s
posthumous rival lovers whilst the actress who plays Antonia’s
worldly-wise mother provides drolly comic relief. This is a film to be
enjoyed more than once.
|